Treatise Second Letter To Dr Free
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-second-letter-to-dr-free-000 |
| Words | 391 |
A Second Letter to the Rev. Dr. Free
Source: The Works of John Wesley, Volume 8 (Zondervan)
Author: John Wesley
---
IN the preface to your Sermon, lately printed, you men
tion your having received my former letter, and add, that “if
the proofs you have now brought do not satisfy me as to the
validity of your former assertions; if I am not yet convinced
that such positions are held by people who pass under the
denomination of Methodists, and will signify this by a private
letter, I shall have a more particular answer.” I desire to live
peaceably with all men; and should therefore wish for no more
than a private answer to a private letter, did the affair lie be
tween you and me. But this is not the case: You have already
appealed to the Archbishop, the University, the nation. Before these judges you have advanced a charge of the highest
kind, not only against me, but a whole body of people. Before these, therefore, I must either confess the charge,
or give in my answer. But you say, “I charge blasphemy, impiety, &c., upon the
profession of Methodism in general. I use no personal
reflections upon you, nor any invective against you, but in the
character of a Methodist.” That is, you first say, “All
Methodists are pickpockets, rebels, blasphemers, Atheists; ”
and then add, “I use no reflections upon you, but in the
character of a Methodist;” but in the character of a pickpocket,
blasphemer, Atheist. None but ! What can you do more? But this, you say, is the practice of all honest men, and a
part of the liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free. Nay,
surely there are some honest men who scruple using their oppo
ments in this manner. At least, I do: Suppose you was an
Atheist, I would not bring against you a railing accusation. I
would still endeavour to “treat you with gentleness and meek
ness,” and thus to “show the sincerity” of my faith. I leave
to you that exquisite “bitterness of spirit, and extreme viru
lence of language,” which, you say, is your duty, and term zeal. (Preface, p. 5.) And certainly zeal, fervour, heat, it is. But
is this heat from above? Is it the offspring of heaven, or a
smoke from the bottomless pit?