Treatise Second Letter On Enthusiasm Of Methodists And Papists
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-second-letter-on-enthusiasm-of-methodists-and-papists-042 |
| Words | 389 |
Wesley has taught
as that infirmities are no sins.” Sir, you have taught me to
wonder at nothing you assert; else I should wonder at this. The words I suppose you refer to, stand in the sermon “On
Salvation by Faith; ” though you do not choose to show your
reader where they may be found: “He that is by faith born of
God sinneth not, (1.) By any habitual sin: Nor, (2.) By any
wilful sin: Nor, (3.) By any sinful desire; for he continually
desireth the holy and perfect will of God: Nor, (4.) Doth he
sin by infirmities, whether in act, word, or thought; for his
infirmities have no concurrence of his will, and, without this,
they are not properly sins.” And this, you seriously declare,
“is a loop-hole to creep out of every moral and religious
obligation 1’’
In the same paragraph, you say I have strongly affirmed
that “all our works and tempers are evil continually; that our
whole heart is altogether corrupt and abominable, and conse
quently our whole life; all our works, the most specious of
them, our righteousness, our prayers, needing an atonement
themselves.” (Vol. I. pp. 76, 97, 161, 214.)
I do strongly affirm this. But of whom? In all these places,
but the last, of myself only. In every one, but this, I speak in
the singular number, and of myself when confessedly an unbe
liever. And of whom do I speak in that last place? Of unbe
lievers, and them only. The words are, “All our tempers and
works in our natural state are only evil continually.”
Now, Sir, where is your loop-hole to creep out? If you have
none, I fear every impartial man will pass sentence upon you,
that you have no regard either to moral or religious obligations. I have now weighed every argument you have brought, to
prove that the “Methodists undermine morality and good
works.” A grievous charge indeed! But the more inexcusable
is he who advances it, but is not able to make it good in any
one single instance. Pardon my pertness, Sir, in not barely
affirming, (that is your manner,) but proving, this: Nay, and
in telling you, that you cannot make amends to God, to me, or
to the world, without a retractation as public as your calumny. 42.