Treatise Second Letter On Enthusiasm Of Methodists And Papists
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-second-letter-on-enthusiasm-of-methodists-and-papists-011 |
| Words | 378 |
Your fifth charges me with an “affectation of prophesy
ing.” Your first proof of it is this:--
“It was about this time that the soldier was executed. For
some time I had visited him every day. But when the love of
God was shed abroad in his heart, I told him, “Do not expect to
see me any more: I believe Satan will separate us for a season.’
Accordingly, the next day, I was informed, the commanding
,
officer had given strict orders, that neither Mr. Wesley, nor
any of his people, should be admitted.” (Vol. I. p. 266.) I
did believe so, having seen many such things before; yet with
out affecting a spirit of prophecy. But that I do claim it, you will prove, Secondly, from my
mentioning “the great work which God intends, and is now
beginning, to work over all the earth.” By what art you ex
tract such a conclusion out of such premises, I know not. That God intends this, none who believe the Scripture doubt. And that he has begun it, both in Europe and America, any,
who will make use of their eyes and ears, may know without
any “miraculous gift of prophesying.”
8. In your sixth section, you assert, that I lay claim to other
miraculous gifts. (Page 45.) As you borrow this objection
from Mr. Church, I need only give the same answer I gave
before. “‘I shall give,’” says Mr. Church, “‘but one account
more, and that is, what you give of yourself.’ The sum whereof
is, “At two several times, being ill, and in violent pain, I prayed
to God, and found immediate ease. I did so. I assert the
fact still. “But if these, you say, ‘ are not miraculous cures,
all this is rank enthusiasm.”
“I will put your argument in form:
“He that believes those are miraculous cures which are not
is a rank enthusiast:
“But you believe those to be miraculous cures which are net:
“Therefore you are a rank enthusiast. “Before I answer, I must know what you mean by miracu
lous: If you term everything so which is ‘not strictly account
able for by the ordinary course of natural causes, then I deny
the latter part of the second proposition.