Treatise Remarks On Hills Review
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-remarks-on-hills-review-030 |
| Words | 395 |
F.’s art has found, that
is, created, above an hundred contradictions in my works,
and “could find abundance more.” Ay, five hundred; under
his forming hand contradictions spring up as quick as mush
rooms. And he that reads only (as is the manner of a thou
sand readers) the running title at the top of each page,--
For election, Against election,
For sinless perfection, Against sinless perfection,
For imputed righteousness, Against imputed righteous
ness, -
and so on, will readily say, “What a heap of contradictions--
flat, palpable contradictions--is here!” Here! Where? “Why,
at the top of every page.” True; and there lies the strength
of the cause. The propositions themselves are plain enough;
but neither Mr. H. nor any man living can prove them. 19. But, if so, if all this laboured contrast be only the
work of a creative imagination, what has Mr. H., the cat’s
paw of a party, been doing all this time? Has he not been
abundantly “doing evil, that good might come,” that the
dear decree of reprobation might stand? Has he not been
“saying all manner of evil falsely;” pouring out slander like
water, a first, a second, a third time, against one that never
willingly offended him? And what recompence can he make
(be his opinions right or wrong) for having so deeply injured
me, without any regard either to mercy or truth? If he (not
I myself) has indeed exposed me in so unjust and inhuman a
manner, what amends can he make, as a Christian and a
gentleman, to God, to me, or to the world? Can he gather
up the foul, poisonous water which he has so abundantly
poured out? If he still insists he has done me no wrong, he
has only spoken “the truth in love;” if he is resolved at all
hazards to fight it out, I will meet him on his own ground. Waving all things else, I fix on this point: “Is that scurrilous
hotch-potch, which he calls a ‘Farrago, true or false?” Will
he defend or retract it? An hundred and one propositions
are produced as mine, which are affirmed to contradict other
propositions of mine. Do I in these hundred and one
instances contradict myself, or do I not? Observe: The
question is, whether I contradict myself; not whether I con
tradict somebody else; be it Mr.