Treatise Remarks On Hills Review
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-remarks-on-hills-review-007 |
| Words | 395 |
Many people are ready enough to contradict
others; but it seems all one to this gentleman whether it be
another or himself, so he may but contradict.”
11. To prove this indictment, (urged home enough, though
there is not one tittle of truth in it,) Mr. H. has cited no less
than a hundred and one witnesses.* Before I enter upon the
examination of these, I beg leave to transcribe what I wrote
some time since to Dr. Rutherforth: “You frequently charge
me with evasion; and others have brought the same charge. The plain case is this: I have wrote on various heads; and
* The very number of propositions extracted out of Quesnel's writings, and
condemned as dreadful heresies in the bull Unigénitus ! Exemplum placet ! See
how good wits jump! Mr. H., Father Walsh, and the Pope of Rome! always as clearly as I could. Yet many have misunderstood
my words, and raised abundance of objections. I answered
them by explaining myself, showing what I did not mean,
and what I did. One and another of the objectors stretched
his throat, and cried out, “Evasion, evasion l’ And what
does all this outcry amount to? Why, exactly thus much:
They imagined they had tied me so fast, that it was
impossible for me to escape. But presently the cobwebs
were swept away, and I was quite at liberty. And I bless
God I can unravel truth and falsehood, although artfully
twisted together. Of such evasion I am not ashamed. Let
them be ashamed who constrain me to use it.”
12. Mr. H.’s numerous proofs of my contradicting myself
may be ranged under twenty-four heads. I shall examine
these one by one, in what appears to me to be the most
natural order:- I
1. “There was an everlast- “There never was any such
ing covenant between God the covenant between God the
Father and God the Son con- Father and God the Son.”
cerning man's redemption.” (Page 128.)
The latter of these I believe, and always did, since I could
read my Bible. But Mr. H. brings a passage out of the Christian Library,
to contradict this. On which he parades as follows: “If the
Christian Library be, as Mr. W. affirms, ‘all true, all agree
able to the word of God,” then what are we to think of his
other works?