Treatise Remarks On Hills Review
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-remarks-on-hills-review-005 |
| Words | 387 |
I do not believe God ever sent
one man into the world, to whom he had decreed never to
give that grace whereby alone he could escape damnation. “(3.) I do not believe (what is only preterition or reproba
tion in other words) any such absolute election, as implies
that all but the absolutely elect shall inevitably be damned. “(4.) I do not believe the doctrine of irresistible grace, or
of infallible perseverance; because both the one and the other
implies that election which cannot stand without preterition
or reprobation.-
“(5.) I do not believe salvation by works. Yet if any man
can prove (what I judge none ever did, or ever will) that there
is no medium between this and absolute predestination; I
will rather subscribe to this than to that, as far less absurd of
the two.”
8. Hinc ille lachrymae. Here is the source of Mr. H.’s
implacable hatred to me. And hence arises his vehement
displeasure at those “Minutes,” which Mr. Sh and he
style “dreadful heresy.” The appellation is just, suppose
(as Mr. H. asserts) all election-doubters are Diabolonians;
suppose no man who is “not clear in the belief of absolute
predestination” can love either God or his neighbour. For
it is certain, the doctrine of the Minutes and of the decrees
cannot stand together. If the doctrine of the decrees stands,
then that of the Minutes must fall; for we willingly allow,
that the one is incompatible with the other. If the doctrine
of the Minutes stands, then that of the decrees must fall. For it is manifest, this, particularly the last article, strikes at
the very root of Calvinism. Of what consequence is it, then,
to one who is persuaded, the belief of Calvinism is essential
to salvation, to expose those Minutes to the uttermost, as well
as any that dares to defend them? 9. In order to this good end, Mr. H. publishes “A Review
of all the Doctrines taught by Mr. John Wesley.” But is it
possible for any man to do this without reading all the writings
that I have published? It is not possible in the nature of
things; he cannot give an account of what he never read. And has Mr. H. read all that I have published? I believe
he will not affirm it.