Treatise Remarks On Hills Farrago
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-remarks-on-hills-farrago-019 |
| Words | 396 |
So if there is
any contradiction here, it is not I contradict myself, but
Isaiah and our Lord that contradict St. Paul.” (Remarks,
pages 389, 390.)
Mr. Hill replies: “Then a man may do works in order to
find favour, and yet such works cannot be called good.” You
may call them so, if you please; but be not angry with me,
if I do not. I still believe, no good works can be done before
justification. Yet I believe, (and that without the least self
contradiction,) that final salvation is “by works as a condi
tion.” And let any one read over the twenty-fifth chapter of
St. Matthew, and deny it if he can. Is Justification by Faith articulus stantis vel cadentis
Ecclesiae? 32. In the beginning of the year 1738, I believed it
was so. Soon after I found reason to doubt. Since that
time I have not varied. “Nay, but in the year 1763
you say, ‘This is the name whereby he shall be called, The
Lord our Righteousness. A truth this, of which may be
affirmed, (what Luther affirms of a truth nearly connected
with it, justification by faith,) it is articulus stantis vel
cadentis Ecclesiae.* It is certainly the pillar and ground
of that faith of which alone cometh salvation.’” (Farrago,
page 15.)
I answered: “It is certain, here is a seeming contradiction;
but it is not a real one; for these two opposite propositions do
not speak of the same thing. The latter speaks of justification
by faith; the former, of trusting in the righteousness or merits
* A doctrine without which there can be no Christian Church. of Christ. (Justification by faith is only mentioned inci. dentally in a parenthesis.) Now, although Mr. Law denied
justification by faith, he might trust in the merits of Christ. It is this, and this only, that I affirm (whatever Luther does)
to be articulus stantis vel cadentis Ecclesiae.” (Remarks,
page 391.)
But Mr. Hill thinks, “justification by faith, and by
trusting in the merits of Christ, are all one.” (Farrago, page
16.) Be they or not, I still think, “ some may doubt of
justification by faith, and yet not perish everlastingly.”
Does Mr. Hill judge that such an one cannot be saved? that
all Mystics (as well as Mr. Law) go to hell? Both Adam’s Sun and Christ’s Righteousness are imputed.