Treatise Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-055 |
| Words | 391 |
(3.) That, with or without them, the
proposition is false; unless so far as it coincides with that you
reject. For it is the believing those to be miracles which are
not, that constitutes an enthusiast; not the representing them
one way or the other; unless so far as it implies such a belief. 12. Upon my answer to the syllogism first proposed, you ob
serve, “Thus” (by denying the latter part of the minor) “you
clear yourself from the charge of enthusiasm, by acknowledging
the cures to be supernatural and miraculous. Why then would
you not speak out, and directly say, that you can work real
and undoubted miracles? This would put the controversy be
tween you and your opposers on a short foot, and be an effectual
proof of the truth of your pretences.” (Second Letter, p. 142.)
V. l. I have in some measure explained myself on the
head of miracles, in the Third Part of the Farther Appeal. But since you repeat the demand, (though without taking any
notice of the arguments there advanced,) I will endeavour
once more to give you a distinct, full, and determinate answer. And, (1.) I acknowledge that I have seen with my eyes, and
heard with my ears, several things which, to the best of my
judgment, cannot be accounted for by the ordinary course of
natural causes; and which I therefore believe ought to be
“ascribed to the extraordinary interposition of God.” If any
man choose to style these miracles, I reclaim not. I have dili
gently inquired into the facts. I have weighed the preceding
and following circumstances. I have strove to account for
them in a natural way. I could not, without doing violence
to my reason. Not to go far back, I am clearly persuaded,
that the sudden deliverance of John Haydon was one in
stance of this kind; and my own recovery, on May 10th,
another. I cannot account for either of these in a natural
way. Therefore I believe they were both supernatural. I must (2.) Observe, that the truth of these facts is sup
ported by the same kind of proof, as that of all other facts is
wont to be, namely, the testimony of competent witnesses; and
that the testimony here is in as high a degree as any reasonable
man can desire.