Treatise Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-046 |
| Words | 373 |
These things must
be represented either as common accidents or as miracles.” I
do not throughly understand your terms. What is a common
accident? that a sparrow falls to the ground, or something
more inconsiderable than the hairs of your head? Is there no
medium between accident and miracle? If there be, what is
that medium? When we are agreed with regard to these few
points, I shall be glad to resume the subject. 6. The fourth instance of my enthusiasm was this, that I
“related judgments inflicted on my opposers.” As to Mr. Molther, I must observe once more, that I do believe
there was a particular providence in his sickness. But I do
not believe, (nor did I design to insinuate,) that it was a
judgment for opposing me. You go on: “Again you mention, “as an awful providence,
the case of a poor wretch who was last week cursing and blas
pheming, and had boasted to many that he would come again
on Sunday, and no man should stop his mouth then. Buton Fri
day God laid his hand upon him, and on Sunday he was buried.”
(Remarks, p. 66.) I answered, “I look on this as a manifest
judgment of God on a hardened sinner, for his complicated
wickedness.” (Page 410.) You reply, “Add, if you please,
“His labouring with all his might to hinder the word of God.”
Here therefore is a confessed judgment for his opposition to
Vou.” (Second Letter, p. 133.) There is, for his thus opposing
with curses and blasphemy. This was part of his complicated
wickedness. Here then you “think I plead guilty.” Not of
enthusiasm, till you prove this was not “an awful providence.”
“Again: ‘One was just going to beat his wife, (which he
frequently did,) when God smote him in a moment, so that his
hand dropped, and he fell down upon the ground, having no
more strength than a new-born child. Have we any warrant
either from Scripture, or the common dispensations of provi
dence, to interpret misfortunes of this nature as judgments?”
(Remarks, p. 67.) I answered, “Can you, Sir, consider this as
one of the common dispensations of providence? Have you
known a parallel one in your life?