Wesley Corpus

whoever opposes me, John Wesley? Do I charge every such person with ‘rejecting the Spirit?” No more than I charge him with robbing on the highway. Do I charge you with rejecting the Spirit?” You reply, “You deny that you charge the opposers with rejecting the Spirit, and affirm, that you never said or thought that what you do is to be accounted the work of God.” Here you blend different sentences together, which I must consider apart, as they were written. And, first, where do I charge you with rejecting the Spirit? If I charge who ever opposes me with this, undoubtedly I charge you. If I do not charge you, that proposition is false; I do not so charge whoever opposes me. Your next words are, “You affirm that you never said or thought that what you do is to be accounted the work of God. If it be the work of God, you need not deny the other point.” Yes, Sir; whether it be or no, I must still deny that I ever charged you with rejecting the Spirit in opposing me. You remark, (9) “His own dreams must be regarded as oracles.” I answered, “Whose? I desire neither my dreams nor my waking thoughts may be regarded at all, unless just so far as they agree with the oracles of God.” To this also you make no reply. You remark, (10.) “However wild his behaviour may be, whatever he does is to be accounted the work of God.” It was to this I answered, “I never said so of what I do; I never thought so.” This answer was ill expressed. And I might have foreseen you would hardly fail to make your advantage of it. I must therefore explain myself upon it a little farther You said, “An enthusiast accounts whatever he does to be the work of God.” I should have said, “But I do not account whatever I do to be the work of God.” What that is which I do account his work will be considered by and by.