Treatise Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-033 |
| Words | 400 |
Whoever is a Minister at all is a
Minister of some particular Church. Neither can he cease to
be a Minister of that Church, till he is cast out of it by a
judicial sentence. Till, therefore, I am so cast out, (which I
trust will never be,) I must style myself a Minister of the
Church of England. 6. Your next objection is, “You not only erect Bands,
which, after the Moravians, you call the United Society, but
also give out tickets to those that continue therein.” These
Bands, you think, “have had very bad consequences, as was
to be expected, when weak people are made leaders of their
brethren, and are set upon expounding Scripture.” (Ibid.)
You are in some mistakes here. For, (1.) The Bands are not
called the United Society.(2.) The United Society was originally
so called, not after the Moravians, but because it consisted of
several smaller societies united together. (3.) Neither the Bands
nor the leaders of them, as such, are “set upon expounding
Scripture.” (4.) The good consequences of their meeting
together in Bands, I know; but the very bad consequences,
I know not. When any members of these, or of the United Society, are
proved to live in known sin, we then mark and avoid them; we
separate ourselves from every one that walks disorderly. Some
times, if the case be judged infectious, (though rarely,) this is
openly declared. And this you style “excommunication;” and
say, “Does not every one see a separate ecclesiastical society
or communion?” (Page 13.) No. This society does not sepa
rate from the communion of the rest of the Church of England. They continue steadfastly with them, both “in the apostolical
doctrine, and in the breaking of bread, and in prayers.” (Which
neither Mr. St-- nor Mr. Simpson does, nor the gentleman
who writes to you in favour of the Moravians, who also writes
pressingly to me to separate myself from the Church.) A
society “over which you had appointed yourself a governor.”
No: so far as I governed them, it was at their own entreaty. “And took upon you all the spiritual authority which the
very highest Church Governor could claim.” What! at Kings
wood, in February, 1740-1? Not so. I took upon me no
other authority (then and there at least) than any Steward of
a society exerts by the consent of the other members.