Treatise Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-032 |
| Words | 386 |
Your parallel case is this: “Because a man does not offend
against the law of the land, when I prevail upon him to teach
my children;” therefore “he is impowered to seize” (read, he
does not offend against the law of the land in seizing) “an apart
ment in my house, and against my will and approbation to conti
nue therein, and to direct and dictate to my family!” (Page 11.)
An exact parallel indeed! When, therefore, I came to live in
St. Luke's parish, was it just the same thing as if I had seized
an apartment in Dr. Buckley's house? And was the continuing
therein against his will and approbation (supposing it were so)
precisely the same, as if I had continued in his house, whether
he would or no? Is the one exactly the same offence against
the law of the land as the other? Once more. Is the warning
sinners in Moorfields to flee from the wrath to come, the very
same with directing the Doctor’s family under his own roof? I should not have answered this, but that I was afraid you
would conclude it was unanswerable. I answered the former objector, (5.) “Before those words
which you suppose to imply such a restraint, were those
spoken without any restraint or limitation at all, which I
apprehend to convey an indelible character, ‘Receive the Holy
Ghost, for the office and work of a Priest in the church of
God, now committed unto thee by the imposition of our
hands.’” You reply, “The question is not, whether you are
in orders or not.” (Ibid. p. 12.) I am glad to hear it. I really
thought it was. “But whether you have acted suitably to the
directions or rules of the Church of England.” Not suitably
to that rule, if it were strictly to be interpreted, of preaching
only in a single congregation. But I have given my reasons
why I think it cannot be so interpreted. And those reasons
I do not see that you have invalidated. I would only add, If I am in orders, if I am a Minister still,
and yet not a Minister of the Church of England, of what
Church am I a Minister? Whoever is a Minister at all is a
Minister of some particular Church.