Treatise Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-027 |
| Words | 394 |
Simpson were
induced to leave it by reasons of quite another kind. You add, “We cannot wonder that some Methodists have
withdrawn from her, while they have been used to hear doc
trines which they must have been sensible have no place in her
Articles and Service.” So far from it, that all I know of them
are deeply sensible, the “doctrines they have been used to
hear” daily, are no other than the genuine doctrines of the
Church, as expressed both in her Articles and Service. 2. But our present question turns not on doctrine but dis
cipline. “My first business,” you say, “is to consider some
very lax notions of Church communion which I find in your last
Journal. Vol.I. p.262, you say, “Our Twentieth Article defines
a true Church, a congregation of faithful people, wherein the
true word of God is preached, and the sacraments duly admi
nistered.” (Page 3.) The use I would willingly make of this
definition, (which, observe, is not mine, be it good or bad,) is
to stop the boasting of ungodly men, by cutting off their pre
tence to call themselves of the Church. But you think they
may call themselves so still. Then let them. I will not con
tend about it. But you cannot infer from hence, that my notions of Church
communion are either lax or otherwise. The definition which
I occasionally cite shows nothing of my sentiments on that
head. And for anything which occurs in this page, they may
be strict or loose, right or wrong. You add, “It will be requisite, in order to approve yourself
a Minister of our Church, that you follow her rules and orders;
that you constantly conform to the method of worship she has
prescribed, and study to promote her peace.” (Page 5.) All
this is good and fit to be done. But it properly belongs to
the following question:
“What led you into such very loose notions of Church com
munion, I imagine, might be, your being conscious to yourself,
that, according to the strict, just, account of the Church of
England, you could not, with any grace, maintain your pre
tensions to belong still to her.” Sir, I have never told you
yet what my notions of Church communion are. They may
be wrong, or they may be right, for all you know.