Treatise Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-014 |
| Words | 391 |
(4) “You ‘praise them for not regarding outward adorn
ing.’” So I do, the bulk of the congregation. “And yet you
say,” (I again recite the whole sentence,) “‘I have heard some
of you affirm that Christian salvation implies liberty to conform
to the world, by putting on gold and costly apparel.’” I have
so; and I blame them the more, because “they are condemned
by the general practice of their own Church.” To this also you
reply not. So I must count this the fourth contradiction which
you have charged upon me, but have not proved. (5) “You call their discipline, in most respects, truly excel
lent. I could wish you had more fully explained yourself. “I
have, in the Second Journal, Vol. I. pp. 115-147. It is no
sign of good discipline to permit such abominations; that is,
error in opinion, and guile in practice. “True; it is not; nor
is it any demonstration against it: For there may be good
discipline even in a college of Jesuits. Another fault is, too
great a deference to the Count. And yet, in most respects,
their discipline is truly excellent.’”
You reply, “Such excellent discipline, for all that I know,
they may have; ” (that is, as the Jesuits;) “but I cannot
agree that this is scarce inferior to that of the apostolical age.”
It may be, for anything you advance to the contrary. “Here
I cited some words of yours, condemning their subordination,
(page 88,) which you prudently take no notice of.” Yes; I had
iust before taken notice of their too great deference to the
Count. But, the contradiction | Where is the contradiction? (6) “You mention it as a good effect of their discipline, that
“every one knows and keeps his proper rank. Soon after, as it
were with a design to confute yourself, you say, ‘Our brethren
have neither wisdom enough to guide, nor prudence enough to
let it alone.’” I answered, “Pardon me, Sir, I have no design
either to confute or contradict myself in these words. The for
mer sentence is spoken of the Moravian brethren; the latter,
of the English brethren of Fetter-Lane, not then united with
the Moravians, neither acting by their direction.” To this
likewise you do not reply. Here is then a sixth contradiction,
alleged against me, but not proved. 13.