Treatise Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-011 |
| Words | 391 |
But neither then, nor at any other
time, did I know, or think, or say, they were desperately wicked
people: I think and say just the reverse; viz., that though I
soon ‘found among them a few things which I could not ap
prove, yet I believe they are, in the main, some of the best Chris
tians in the world. After this, are you the person who com
plains of me for imperfect and partial quotations?” (Page 10.)
I added, “You surprise me yet more in going on thus:
In God’s name, Sir, is the contempt of almost the whole of
our duty, of every Christian ordinance, to be so very gently
touched ?’ Sir, this is not the case. This charge no more
belongs to the Moravians than that of murder.” (Page 11.)
You reply, “Mr. Sp and Mr. Molther are accused by
name. If falsely, I am sorry both for them and you.”
Accused ? True. But of what? of the contempt of every
Christian ordinance, of almost the whole of our duty? By
no means. The plain case is, I accuse them of one thing,
viz., teaching that an unbeliever should abstain from the
ordinances. You accuse them of another,-contemning
every Christian ordinance, and almost the whole of our duty. And this you would father upon me. I desire to be excused. 10. As to what I said in my letter to the Moravian
Church, “You can hinder this if you will; therefore, if you
do not prevent their speaking thus, you do, in effect, speak
thus yourselves,”--it may be observed, (1.) That this letter is
dated August 8, 1741. (2.) That from that time the Mora
vian Church did in great measure prevent any of their
members speaking thus. You proceed: “You distinguish between the English breth
ren and the Moravians. These English brethren, I presume,
were your followers. Afterwards you represent them as per
verted by the Moravians: ‘Before they had spoke these wicked
things, you say, ‘they had joined these men, and acted under
their direction. If they did not learn them from these new
teachers, from whom did they learn them? Not, sure, from
yourself, or any other Methodists. You cannot, therefore,
bring off the Moravians without condemning your own
people. Here, therefore, you have certainly overshot your
self.” (Page 85.) Perhaps not.