Wesley Corpus

Treatise Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained

AuthorJohn Wesley
Typetreatise
YearNone
Passage IDjw-treatise-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-005
Words386
Catholic Spirit Primitive Christianity Works of Piety
It is now my turn to complain of unfair usage; of the exceeding lame, broken, imperfect manner wherein you cite my words. For instance, your citation runs thus: You“never knew but one of the Mora vian Church affirm, that a believer does not grow in holiness.” Whereas my words are these: “I never knew one of the Mora vian Church, but that single person, affirm, that a believer does not grow in holiness; and perhaps he would not affirm it on reflection.” Now, why was the former part of the sentence changed, and the latter quite left out? Had the whole stood in your tract just as it does in mine, it must have appeared I do not here charge the Moravian Church. I complain also of your manner of replying to the first article of this very paragraph. For you do not cite so much as one line of that answer to which you profess to reply. My words are, “You ought not to charge the Moravian Church with the first of these” errors, “since in the very page from which you quote those words, “There is no justifying faith where there ever is any doubt,’ that note occurs, (viz., Vol. I. p. 328,) “In the preface to the Second Journal, the Moravian Church is cleared from this mistake.” If you had cited these words, could you possibly have subjoined, “I have not charged the Moravian Church with anything; but only repeat after you?” 4. I have now considered one page of your reply, in the man ner you seem to require. But sure you cannot expect I should follow you thus, step by step, through a hundred and forty pages! If you should then think it worth while to make a second reply, and to follow me in the same manner, we might write indeed, but who would read? I return therefore to what I proposed at first, viz., to touch only on what seems of the most importance, and leave the rest just as it lies. 5. You say, “With regard to subtlety, evasion, and disguise, you now would have it thought, that you only found this ‘in many of them; not in all, nor in most.” (Page 80) “You now would have it thought !” Yes, and always, as well as now.