Treatise Preface To Treatise On Justification
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-preface-to-treatise-on-justification-007 |
| Words | 384 |
Such are those of Samuel, Daniel, yea,
and Job, in the former; of St. Paul and St. John, in the latter. “But God styles him “a man after his own heart.’” This
is the text which has caused many to mistake, for want of
considering, First, that this is said of David in a particular
respect, not with regard to his whole character: Secondly,
the time at which it was spoken. When was David “a
man after God’s own heart?” When God found him
“following the ewes great with young,” when he “took him
from the sheep-folds.” (Psalm lxxviii. 70, 71.) It was in the
second or third year of Saul’s reign, that Samuel said to him,
“The Lord hath sought him a man after his own heart,
and hath commanded him to be captain over his people.”
(1 Sam. xiii. 14.) But was he “a man after God’s own
heart” all his life? or in all particulars? So far from it, that
we have few more exceptionable characters among all the
men of God recorded in Scripture. “There is not a just man upon earth that sinneth not.”
Solomon might truly say so, before Christ came. And St. John might, after he came, say as truly, “Whosoever is born
of God sinneth not.” (Page 261.) But “in many things we
offend all.” That St. James does not speak this of himself,
or of real Christians, will clearly appear to all who impartially
consider the context. The Ninth Dialogue proves excellently well, that we cannot
be justified by our works. But have you throughly considered the words which occur
in the 270th page? “O children of Adam, you are no longer obliged to love
God with all your strength, nor your neighbour as yourselves. Once indeed I insisted on absolute purity of heart; now, I
can dispense with some degrees of evil desire. Since Christ
has fulfilled the law for you, you need not fulfil it. I will
connive at, yea, accommodate my demands to, your weakness.”
I agree with you, that “this doctrine makes the Holy One of
God a minister of sin.” And is it not your own Is not this
the very doctrine which you espouse throughout your book? I cannot but except to several passages also in the Tenth
Dialogue.