Treatise Predestination Calmly Considered
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-predestination-calmly-considered-058 |
| Words | 366 |
“Now, here the man, in the former clause, who ‘draws
back, is distinguished from him, in the following clause, who
lives by faith. “But the Apostle quotes the text from this translation.”
True; but he does not “distinguish the man in the former
clause who ‘draws back, from him, in the latter, who ‘lives
by faith.” So far from it, that he quite inverts the order of
the sentence, placing the latter clause of it first. And by this
means it comes to pass, that although, in translating this text
from the Septuagint, we must insert “a man,” (because there
is no nominative preceding,) yet in translating it from the
Apostle, there is no need or pretence for inserting it, seeing
o Bixalog stands just before. Therefore, such an insertion is a palpable violence to the
text; which, consequently, is not rightly translated. It remains, that those who live by faith may yet fall from
God, and perish everlastingly. 78. Eighthly. Those who are sanctified by the blood of the
covenant may so fall as to perish everlastingly. For thus again saith the Apostle: “If we sin wilfully, after
we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth
no more sacrifice for sin; but a certain fearful looking for of
judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adver
saries. He that despised Moses’ law died without mercy
under two or three witnesses. Of how much sorer punish
ment shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under
foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the cove
nant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing?”
It is undeniably plain, (1.) That the person mentioned here
was once sanctified by the blood of the covenant. (2.) That
he afterward, by known, wilful sin, trod under foot the Son
of God. And, (3.) That he hereby incurred a sorer punish
ment than death; namely, death everlasting. “Nay, the immediate antecedent to the relative ‘he, is ‘the
Son of God.” Therefore it was He, not the apostate, who was
sanctified (set apart for his priestly office) by the blood of the
covenant.”
Either you forgot to look at the original, or your memory
fails.