Treatise Life And Death Of John Fletcher
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-life-and-death-of-john-fletcher-078 |
| Words | 390 |
Whatever he believed to be
the will of God, he resolutely performed, though it were to
pluck out a right eye, to lay his Isaac on the altar. When it
appeared that God called him to any journey, he immediately
prepared for it, without the least hesitation; although, for the
last years of his life, he hardly ever travelled to any consider
able distance, without feeling some tendency to a relapse
into his former distemper; and it was usually some weeks
after his return, before he recovered his usual strength.”
Humility continually produces meekness, and the latter
bears an exact proportion to the former. I received a letter
on this head but a few days since, which it may not be
improper to subjoin :
“Rev. SIR,
“I was yesterday in company with several Clergymen,
who, among other things, mentioned Mr. Fletcher, and seemed
particularly anxious that in the account of his life a proper
degree of caution should be observed in the panegyric that
may be applied to his character. They say he was extremely
passionate; and that there was in many instances an austere
severity and rigour in his conduct to the young people under
his care, particularly at Trevecka. As this information comes
from a gentleman eminent for his knowledge of mankind,
and universally esteemed as one of the greatest geniuses of
the age, and one whose veracity has never been questioned,
it will have no small weight in the learned world.”
7. I am glad this information came to my hands in time,
as it may now receive so sufficient an answer as will probably
satisfy every candid and impartial reader. Two things are here asserted concerning Mr. Fletcher: The
First, that he was extremely passionate: The Second, that
there was an austere severity and rigour in his conduct toward
the young persons under his care, particularly at Trevecka. The former assertion is unquestionably true; such he was by
nature. The latter I question much, with regard to his con
duct at Tern, as well as at Trevecka. None can be a more
competent witness of his conduct at Tern, than Mr. Vaughan,
who lived so long in the same house; and whose testimony
concerning him has been so largely given in the preceding
pages. But, waving this, can it possibly be supposed, that
either Mr.