Treatise Life And Death Of John Fletcher
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-life-and-death-of-john-fletcher-033 |
| Words | 361 |
It being judged quite improper for him to remain in
London, on December 16, 1776, he retired to the house of a
friend, Mr. Charles Greenwood, (now with God,) to Stoke
Newington. Here he had the advice of the most eminent
Physicians that London could afford. He was also in a good
air, and had every convenience and every help which art could
bestow. One of the family, of whom I inquired concerning
this part of his life, gave me the following information :
12. “Agreeably to your desire, I endeavour to recollect some
particulars of Mr. Fletcher, during his abode at Newington. “When he first came, he was, by Dr. Fothergill's advice,
under the strictest observance of two things,--rest and silence. These, together with a milk diet, were supposed to be the only
probable means of his recovery. In consequence of these
directions, he spoke exceeding little. If ever he spoke more
than usual, it did not fail to increase his spitting of blood;
of which, indeed, he was seldom quite clear, although it was
not violent: Therefore, a great part of his time was spent in
being read to. But it was not possible to restrain him altogether
from speaking. The fire which continually burned in his
heart many waters could not quench. It often burst out
unawares. And then how did we wonder (like those who
formerly heard his Lord) “at the gracious words which
proceeded out of his mouth !’ He could not have sustained
life without sometimes giving vent to his heart. No penance
could have appeared so severe a cross to him, as to be
debarred from speaking of or to God. His natural vivacity,
with his intense love of Jesus, continually impelled him to
speak. But, on being reminded of his rule, with a cheerful
smile, he was all submission; consenting by signs only to
stir up those about him to pray and praise ! 13. “Whoever has read Mr. Fletcher's Last Check to
Antinomianism, and has had the privilege of observing his
spirit and conduct, will not scruple to say that he was a living
comment on his own account of Christian perfection.