Treatise Letter To The Bishop Of London
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-the-bishop-of-london-005 |
| Words | 357 |
I conjure you, my Lord, by the mercies of God, if these
are not the words of truth and soberness, point me out wherein
I have erred from the truth; show me clearly wherein I have
spoken either beyond or contrary to the word of God. But
might I not humbly entreat, that your Lordship, in doing this,
would abstain from such expressions as these: “If they will but
put themselves under their direction and discipline,--after their
course of discipline is once over,” (ibid. p. 15,) as not suitable
either to the weight of the subject, or the dignity of your Lord
ship's character. And might I not expect something more than
these loose assertions, that this is “a delusion altogether
groundless; a notion contrary to the whole tenor both of the
Old and New Testament; ” that “the Scriptures forbid all
thought of it, as vain, arrogant, and presumptuous;” that they
“represent all mankind, without distinction, as subject to sin
and corruption” (subject to sin and corruption l strong words!)
“during their continuance in this world; and require no more
than an honest desire and endeavour to find ourselves less and
less in a state of imperfection.” (Ibid. pp. 15, 16.)
Is it not from your Lordship's entirely mistaking the ques
tion, not at all apprehending what perfection I teach, that you
go on to guard against the same imaginary consequences, as
your Lordship did in the “Observations?” Surely, my Lord,
you never gave yourself the trouble to read the answer given in
the “Farther Appeal,” to every objection which you now urge
afresh; seeing you do not now appear to know any more of
my sentiments than if you had never proposed one question,
nor received one answer, upon the subject! 10. If your Lordship designed to show my real sentiments
concerning the last doctrine which you mention, as one would
imagine by your adding, “These are his own words,” (ibid. p. 18,) should you not have cited all my own words? at least
all the words of that paragraph, and not have mangled it as
Mr. Church did before? It runs thus: “Saturday, 28.