Treatise Letter To Person Joined With Quakers
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-person-joined-with-quakers-005 |
| Words | 400 |
When you take it for granted, “In all
preachings which a man begins or ends at his pleasure, does
or leaves undone as he sees meet, he is not moved by the
Spirit of God,” you are too hasty a great deal. It may be by
the Spirit, that he sees meet to do or leave it undone. How
will you prove that it is not? His pleasure may depend on
the pleasure of God, signified to him by his Spirit. His
appointing this or that time or place does in nowise prove the
contrary. Prove me that proposition, if you can: “Every man
who preaches or prays at an appointed time, preaches or prays
in his own will, and not by the Spirit.”
That “all such preaching is will-worship, in the sense St. Paul uses the word,” is no more true than that it is murder. That it is superstition, remains also to be proved. That it is
abominable idolatry, how will you reconcile with what follows
but a few lines after? “However, it might please God, who
winked at the times of ignorance, to raise some breathings
and answer them.” What! answer the breathings of abomi
nable idolatry ! I observe how warily this is worded; but it
allows enough. If God ever raised and answered those
prayers which were made at set times, then those prayers
could not be abominable idolatry. Again: That prayers and preachings, though made at
appointed times, may yet proceed from the Spirit of God,
may be clearly proved from those other words of Robert
Barclay himself, page 389:--
“That preaching or prayer which is not done by the actings
and movings of God’s Spirit cannot beget faith.” Most true. But preaching and prayer at appointed times have begotten
faith both at Bristol and Paulton. You know it well. There
fore that preaching and prayer, though at appointed times,
was “done by the actings and movings of God’s Spirit.”
It follows, that this preaching and prayer were far from
“abominable idolatry.” That expression can never be
defended. Say, It was a rash word, and give it up. In truth, from the beginning to the end, you set this matter
upon a wrong foundation. It is not on this circumstance,--
the being at set times or not, that the acceptableness of our
prayers depends; but on the intention and tempers with which
we pray.