Treatise Letter To Mr Toogood
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-mr-toogood-001 |
| Words | 392 |
If
it has this power, then all the objections of the Dissenters,
about kneeling at the Lord’s supper, and the like, are
impertinent: If it has no power at all of this kind, yea, if
Christ, the great Lawgiver and King of the Church, hath
expressly commanded, that no power of this kind shall ever
be claimed or ever be yielded by any of his followers; then
the Dissenters will have honour before God for protesting
against such usurpation.” (Page 3.)
I join issue on this single point: “If Christ hath expressly
commanded, that no power of this kind shall ever be claimed,
or ever yielded, by any of his followers;” then are all who
yield it, all Churchmen, in a state of damnation, as much as
those who “deny the Lord that bought them.” But if
Christ hath not expressly commanded this, we may go to
church, and yet not go to hell. To the point then: The power I speak of is a power of
decreeing rites and ceremonies, of appointing such circum
stantials (suppose) of public worship as are in themselves
purely indifferent, being no way determined in Scripture. And the question is, “Hath Christ expressly commanded,
that this power shall never be claimed, nor ever yielded, by any
of his followers?” This I deny. How do you prove it? Why, thus: “If the Church of England has this power,
so has the Church of Rome.” (Page 4.) Allowed. But
this is not to the purpose. I want “the express command
of Christ.”
You say, “Secondly, The persons who have this power in
England, are not the Clergy, but the Parliament.” (Pages 8,
9.) Perhaps so. But this also strikes wide. Where is
“the express command of Christ?”
You ask, “Thirdly, How came the civil Magistrate by this
power?” (Page 11.) “Christ commands us to ‘call no man
upon earth father and master;’ that is, to acknowledge no
authority of any in matters of religion.” (Page 12.) At
length we are come to the express command, which, according
to your interpretation, is express enough ; “that is, Acknow
ledge no authority of any in matters of religion;” own no
power in any to appoint any circumstance of public worship,
anything pertaining to decency and order. But this inter
pretation is not allowed. It is the very point in question.