Treatise Letter To Mr Downes
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-mr-downes-007 |
| Words | 388 |
Mary’s, on January 1, 1733. You may read it when
you are at leisure; for it is in print, entitled, “The Circumci
sion of the Heart.” And whoever reads only that one dis
course, with any tolerable share of attention, will easily judge,
whether that “model of religion flatters the follies of degene
rate man,” or is likely to “gain the hearts of multitudes, es
pecially of the loose and vicious, the lazy and indolent !” Will
a man choose this, as “the shortest way to heaven, and with
the least trouble?” Are these “as easy terms as any libertine”
or infidel “can desire?” The truth is, we have been these thirty
years continually reproached for just the contrary to what you
dream of; with making the way to heaven too strait; with
being ourselves “righteous overmuch,” and teaching others,
they could not be saved without so many works as it was im
possible for them to perform. And to this day, instead of
teaching men that they may be saved by a faith which is without
good works, without “gospel-obedience and holiness of life,”
weteach exactly the reverse, continually insisting on all outward
as well as all inward holiness. For the notorious truth of this
we appeal to the whole tenor of our sermons, printed and un
printed; in particular to those upon “Our Lord’s Sermon on the
Mount,” whereinevery branch ofgospelobedienceisboth asserted
and proved to be indispensably necessary to eternal salvation. Therefore, as to the rest of the “Antinomian trash ’’ which
you have so carefully gathered up, as, “that the regenerate
are as pure as Christ himself; that it would be criminal for
them to pray for pardon; that the greatest crimes are no crimes
in the saints,” &c. &c., (page 17) I have no concern therewith
at all, no more than with any that teach it. Indeed I have
confuted it over and over, in tracts published many years ago. 9. A Second charge which you advance is, that “we suppose
every man’s final doom to depend on God’s sovereign will and
pleasure;” (I presume you mean, on his absolute, unconditional
decree;) that we “consider man as a mere machine;” that we
suppose believers “cannot fall from grace.” (Page 31.) Nay, I
suppose none of these things. Let those who do, answer for
themselves.