Treatise Letter To Mr Downes
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-mr-downes-004 |
| Words | 388 |
Methodist.” (Page 17.) I wish you do not squint at the honest
countenance of Mr. Venn, who is indeed as far from fear as
he is from guile. But if it is somewhat “bloated,” that is not
his fault; sickness may have the same effect on yours or mine. But to come closer to the point: “They have darkened re
ligion with many ridiculous fancies, tending to confound the
head, and to corrupt the heart.” (Page 13.) “A thorough
knowledge of them would work, in every rightly-disposed
mind, an abhorrence of those doctrines which directly tend to
distract the head, and to debauch the heart, by turning faith
into frenzy, and the grace of God into wantonness.” (Pages
101, 102.) “These doctrines are unreasonable and ridiculous,
clashing with our natural ideas of the divine perfections, with
the end of religion, with the honour of God, and man’s both
present and future happiness. Therefore we pronounce them
‘filthy dreamers, turning faith into fancy, the gospel into
farce; thus adding blasphemy to enthusiasm.” (Pages 66,68.)
Take breath, Sir; there is a long paragraph behind. “The
abettors of these wild and whimsical notions are, (1.) Close
friends to the Church of Rome, agreeing with her in almost
everything but the doctrine of merit: (2.) They are no less
kind to infidelity, by making the Christian religion a mere
creature of the imagination : (3.) They cut up Christianity by
the roots, frustrating the very end for which Christ died,
which was, that by holiness we might be ‘made meet for the
inheritance of the saints: (4.) They are enemies not only to
Christianity, but to “every religion whatsoever, by labouring
to subvert or overturn the whole system of morality: (5.)
Consequently, they must be enemies of society, dissolving
the band by which it is united and knit together.” In a
word: “All ancient heresies have in a manner concentred in
the Methodists; particularly those of the Simonians, Gnos
tics, Antinomians,” (as widely distant from each other as Pre
destinarians from Calvinists 1) “Valentinians, Donatists, and
Montanists.” (Pages 101, 102.) While your hand was in, you
might as well have added, Carpocratians, Eutychians, Nesto
rians, Sabellians. If you say, “I never heard of them; ” no
matter for that; you may find them, as well as the rest, in
Bishop Pearson’s index.