Treatise Letter To Mr Downes
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-mr-downes-002 |
| Words | 373 |
4. “The Church of Rome (to which on so many accounts
they were much obliged, and as gratefully returned the obliga
tion) taught them to set up for infallible interpreters of Scrip
ture.” (Page 54.) Pray on what accounts are we “obliged
to the Church of Rome?” And how have we “returned the
obligation?” I beg you would please, (1.) To explain this;
and, (2.) To prove that we ever yet (whoever taught us) “set
up for infallible interpreters of Scripture.” So far from it, that
we have over and over declared, in print as well as in public
preaching, “We are no more to expect any living man to be
infallible than to be omniscient.” (Vol. VI. p. 4.)
5. “As to other extraordinary gifts, influences, and operations
of the Holy Ghost, no man who has but once dipped into their
Journals, and other ostentatious trash of the same kind, can
doubt their looking upon themselves as not coming one whit
behind the greatest of the Apostles.” (Methodism Examined,
p. 21.)
I acquit you, Sir, of ever having “once dipped into that
ostentatious trash.” I do not accuse you of having read so
much as the titles of my Journals. I say, my Journals; for
(as little as you seem to know it) my brother has published
none. I therefore look upon this as simple ignorance. You
talk thus, because you know no better. You do not know, that
in these very Journals I utterly disclaim the “extraordinarygifts
of the Spirit,” and all other “influences and operations of the
Holy Ghost” than those that are common to all real Christians. And yet I will not say, this ignorance is blameless. For
ought you not to have known better? Ought you not to have
taken the pains of procuring better information, when it
might so easily have been had 7 Ought you to have publicly
advanced so heavy charges as these, without knowing whether
they were true or no? 6. You proceed to give as punctual an account of us, tan
quam intus et in cute nosses : * “They outstripped, if pos
sible, even Montanus, for external sanctity and severity of
discipline.” (Page 22.) “They condemned all regard for tem
poral concerns.