Treatise Letter To Mr Baily
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-mr-baily-023 |
| Words | 394 |
(2.) How
strangely did you under-rate my revenue, when you wrote in
the person of George Fisher ! You then allowed me only an
hundred pounds a year. What is this to two thousand pence
a week? (3.) “There is not a Clergyman,” you say, “who
would not willingly exchange his livings for your yearly penny
contributions.” (Page 21.) And no wonder: For, according
to a late computation, they amount to no less every year, than
eight hundred, eighty-six thousand pounds, besides some odd
shillings and pence; in comparison of which, the revenue of his
Grace of Armagh, or of Canterbury, is a very trifle. And yet,
Sir, so great is my regard for you, and my gratitude for your late
services, that if you will only resign your Curacy of Christ's
Church, I will make over to you my whole revenue in Ireland. 19. But “the honour.” I gain, you think, is even “greater
than the profit.” Alas, Sir, I have not generosity enough to
relish it. I was always of Juvenal's mind,--
Gloria quantalibet, quid erit, si gloria tantum est **
And especially, while there are so many drawbacks, so many
dead flies in the pot of ointment. Sheer honour might taste
tolerably well. But there is gall with the honey, and less of the
honey than the gall. Pray, Sir, what think you? Have I more
honour or dishonour? Do more people praise or blame me? How is it in Cork? may, to go no farther, among your own
little circle of acquaintance? Where you hear one commend,
do not ten cry out, “Away with such a fellow from the
earth ?”
Above all, I do not love honour with dry blows. I do not
find it will cure broken bones. But perhaps you may think I
glory in these. O how should I have gloried, then, if your good
* What is glory, without profit too? friends at Dant's Bridge had burnt my person, instead of my
effigy |
We are here to set religion out of the question. You do
not suppose I have anything to do with that. Why, if so, I
should rather leave you the honour, and myself sleep in a
whole skin. On that supposition I quite agree with the epi
grammatist :
Virgilii in tumulo, divini premia valis,
Erplicat en viridem laurea laeta comam.