Treatise Letter To Mr Baily
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-mr-baily-013 |
| Words | 391 |
Yet they did not
find any of these bills | But they found one against Daniel
Sullivan, the younger, (no Preacher, but a hearer of the people
called Methodists,) who, when Butler and his mob were dis
charging a shower of stones upon him, fired a pistol, without
any ball, over their heads. If any man has wrote this story to
England, in a quite different manner, and fixed it on a young
Methodist Preacher, let him be ashamed in the presence of God
and man, unless shame and he have shook hands and parted. 17. Several of the persons presented as vagabonds in
autumn appeared at the Lent Assizes. But none appearing
against them, they were discharged, with honour to themselves,
and shame to their prosecutors; who, by bringing the matter
to a judicial determination, plainly showed, there is a law
even for Methodists; and gave His Majesty’s Judge a full
occasion to delare the utter illegality of all riots, and the
inexcusableness of tolerating (much more causing) them on
any pretence whatsoever. 18. It was now generally believed there would be no more
riots in Cork; although I cannot say that was my opinion. On May 19, I accepted the repeated invitation of Mr. Alderman
Pembrock, and came to his house. Understanding the place
where the preaching usually was, would by no means contain
those who desired to hear me, at eight in the morning I went
to Hammond’s Marsh. The congregation was large and
deeply attentive. A few of the rabble gathered at a distance;
but by little and little they drew near, and mixed with the
congregation. So that I have seldom seen a more quiet and
orderly assembly at any church in England or Ireland. 19. In the afternoon a report being spread abroad, that the
Mayor designed to hinder my preaching on the Marsh, I desired
Mr. Skelton and Jones to wait upon him, and inquire concerning
it. Mr. Skelton asked if my preaching there would be offensive
to him; adding, “If it would, Mr. W. would not do it.” He
replied warmly, “Sir, I will have no mobbing.” Mr. S. said,
“Sir, there was none this morning.” He answered, “There
was. Are there not churches and meeting-houses enough 2
I will have no more mobs and riots.” Mr. S. replied, “Sir,
neither Mr. W.