Wesley Corpus

Our Lord said to the man born blind, “Go and wash in the pool of Siloam.” Here was a plain condition to be performed; something without which he would not have received his sight. And yet his sight was a gift altogether as free, as if the pool had never been mentioned. “But if repentance and faith are the free gifts of God, can they be the terms or conditions of our justification?” (Page 9.) Yes: Why not? They are still something without which no man is or can be justified. “Can then God give that freely, which he does not give but upon certain terms and conditions?” (Ibid.) Doubtless he can; as one may freely give you a sum of money, on condition you stretch out your hand to receive it. It is therefore no “contradiction to say, We are justified freely by grace, and yet upon certain terms or conditions.” (Page 10.) I cannot therefore agree, that “we are accepted without any terms previously performed to qualify us for acceptance.” For we are not accepted, nor are we qualified for, or capable of, acceptance, without repentance and faith. “But a man is not justified by works, but by the faith of Christ. This excludes all qualifications.” (Page 13.) Surely it does not exclude the qualification of faith ! “But St. Paul asserts, ‘To him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted to him for righteousness.’” True: “To him that worketh not.” But does God justify him that “believeth not?” Otherwise, this text proves just the contrary to what it is brought to prove. But “our Church excludes repentance and faith from deserving any part of our justification. Why then do you insist upon them as qualifications requisite to our justifica tion?” (Page 19.) Because Christ and his Apostles do so. Yet we all agree, they do not deserve any part of our justification. They are no part of the meritorious cause; but they are the conditions of it.