Treatise Letter To Gentleman At Bristol
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-gentleman-at-bristol-001 |
| Words | 395 |
Therefore, till heaven and earth pass away, these truths will
not pass away. But I do not agree with the author of that tract, in the
spirit of the whole performance. It does not seem to breathe
either that modesty, or seriousness, or charity, which one
would desire. One would not desire to hear any private
person, of no great note in the Church or the world, speak, as
it were, ex cathedrá, with an air of infallibility, or at least
of vast self-sufficiency, on a point wherein men of eminence,
both for piety, learning, and office, have been so greatly
divided. Though my judgment is nothing altered, yet I often
condemn myself for my past manner of speaking on this head. Again: I do not rejoice at observing any thing light or
ludicrous in an answer to so serious a paper; and much less
in finding any man branded as a Papist, because his doctrine
in one particular instance resembles (for that is the utmost
which can be proved) a doctrine of the Church of Rome. I
can in no wise reconcile this to the grand rule of charity,--
Doing to others as we would they should do to us. Indeed, it is said, “Dr. T. openly defends the fundamental
doctrine of Popery, justification by works.” (Page 3.) There
fore, “he must be a Papist.” (Page 4.) But here is a double
mistake: For, 1. Whatever may be implied in some of his
expressions, it is most certain Dr. T. does not openly defend
justification by works. 2. This itself, justification by works,
is not the fundamental doctrine of Popery, but the universality
of the Romish Church, and the supremacy of the Bishop of
Rome. And to call any one a Papist who denies these, is
neither charity nor justice. I do not agree with the author in what follows: Dr. T. “loses sight of the truth, when he talks of Christ’s having
obtained for us a covenant of better hopes; and that faith
and repentance are the terms of this covenant. They are
not. They are the free gifts of the covenant of grace, not the
terms or conditions. To say, ‘Privileges of the covenant art
the terms or conditions of it,” is downright Popery.”
This is downright calling names, and no better. But it
falls on a greater than Dr. T. St.