Treatise Letter To Dr Conyers Middleton
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-dr-conyers-middleton-078 |
| Words | 399 |
You have only now and then, as it were by the by, made any
attempt to prove it. And till this is done, you have done
nothing, with all the pother that you have made. 14. You reserve the home stroke for the last : “There is
hardly a miracle said to be wrought in the primitive times, but
what is said to be performed in our days. But all these modern
pretensions we ascribe to their true cause,--the craft of a few,
playing upon the credulity of the many, for private interest. When, therefore, we read of the same things done by the
ancients, and for the same ends of acquiring wealth, credit, or
power; how can we possibly hesitate to impute them to the
same cause of fraud and imposture?” (Page 230.)
The reason of our hesitation is this: They did not answer
the same ends. The modern Clergy of Rome do acquire credit
and wealth by their pretended miracles. But the ancient
Clergy acquired nothing by their miracles, but to be “afflicted,
destitute, tormented.” The one gain all things thereby; the
others lost all things. And this, we think, makes some differ
ence. “Even unto this present hour,” says one of them,
(writing to those who could easily confute him, if he spoke not
the truth,) “we both hunger and thirst, and are naked, and are
buffeted, and have no certain dwelling-place. Being reviled,
we bless; being persecuted, we suffer it; being defamed, we
entreat. We are become as the filth of the world, as the off
scouring of all things unto this day.” (1 Cor. iv. 11--13.) Now,
Sir, whatever be thought of the others, we apprehend, such
Clergy as these, labouring thus, unto the death, for such credit
and wealth, are not chargeable with fraud and imposture. VI. I have now finished what I had to say with regard to
your book. Yet I think humanity requires me to add a few
words concerning some points frequently touched upon therein,
which perhaps you do not so clearly understand. We have been long disputing about Christians, about Chris
tianity, and the evidence whereby it is supported. But what
do these terms mean? Who is a Christian indeed? What is
real, genuine Christianity? And what is the surest and most
accessible evidence (if I may so speak) whereby I may know
that it is of God?