Treatise Letter To Dr Conyers Middleton
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-dr-conyers-middleton-060 |
| Words | 389 |
And so were the prophecies of the Old
Testament, according to the current opinion of those earlier
days.” (Page 111.)
That this was then “the current opinion,” you bring three
citations to prove. But if you could cite three Fathers more
during the three first centuries, expressly affirming that the
Prophets were all out of their senses, I would not take their
word. For though I take most of the Fathers to have been
wise and good men, yet I know none of them were infallible. But do even these three expressly"affirm it? No, not one of
them; at least in the words you have cited. From Athena
goras you cite only part of a sentence, which, translated as
literally as it will well bear, runs thus: “Who in an ecstasy of
their own thoughts, being moved by the Divine Spirit, spoke
the things with which they were inspired, even as a piper
breathes into a pipe.” Does Athenagoras expressly affirm in
these words, that the Prophets were “transported out of
their senses?” I hope, Sir, you do not understand Greek
If so, you show here only a little harmless ignorance. 13. From Justin Martyr also you cite but part of a
sentence. He speaks, very nearly, thus:-o
“That the Spirit of God, descending from heaven, and
using righteous men as the quill strikes the harp or lyre, may
reveal unto us the knowledge of divine and heavenly things.”
And does Justin expressly affirm in these words, that all the
Prophets were “transported out of their senses?”
Tertullian’s words are : “A man being in the Spirit,
especially when he beholds the glory of God, must needs lose
sense.”* Now, as it is not plain that he means hereby, lose
his understanding, (it being at least equally probable, that he
intends no more than, losing for the time the use of his out
ward senses,) neither can it be said that Tertullian expressly
affirms, “The Prophets were all out of their senses.” There
fore you have not so much as one Father to vouch for what
you say was “the current opinion in those days.”
14. I doubt not but all men of learning will observe a
circumstance which holds throughout all your quotations. The strength of your argument constantly lies in a loose and
paraphrastical manner of translating.