Treatise Letter To Dr Conyers Middleton
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-dr-conyers-middleton-051 |
| Words | 382 |
7. But “it is very hard to believe what Origen declares, that
the devils used to possess and destroy cattle.” You might
have said, what Matthew and Mark declare concerning the
herd of swine; and yet we shall find you, by and by, believing
far harder things than this. Before you subjoined the silly story of Hilarion and his
camel, you should, in candour, have informed your reader,
that it is disputed, whether the life of Hilarion was wrote by
St. Jerome or no. But, be it as it may, I have no concern
for either: For they did not live within the three first ages. 8. I know not what you have proved hitherto, though you
have affirmed many things, and intimated more. But now
we come to the strength of the cause, contained in your five
observations. You observe, First, “that all the primitive accounts of
casting out devils, though given by different Fathers, and in
different ages, yet exactly agree with regard to all the main
circumstances.” (Page 91.) And this you apprehend to be a
mark of imposture. “It looks,” you say, “as if they copied
from each other !” Now, a vulgar reader would have
imagined that any single account of this kind must be
rendered much more (not less) credible, by parallel accounts
of what many had severally seen, at different times, and in
different places. 9. You observe, Secondly, “that the persons thus
possessed were called sy/aspiu.uffol, ‘ventriloquists;’” (some
of them were;) “because they were generally believed to
speak out of the belly. Now, there are, at this day,” you
say, “those who, by art and practice, can speak in the same
manner. If we suppose, then, that there were artists of this
kind among the ancient Christians, how easily, by a corre
spondence between the ventriloquist and the exorcist, might
they delude the most sensible of their audience 1” (Page 92.)
But what did the ventriloquist do with his epilepsy in the
mean time? You must not let it go, because many of the
circumstances wherein all these accounts agree cannot be
tolerably accounted for without it. And yet, how will you
make these two agree? It is a point worthy your serious
consideration. But cheats, doubtless, they were, account for it who can.