Treatise Letter To Dr Conyers Middleton
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-dr-conyers-middleton-028 |
| Words | 379 |
1. The Second thing you proposed was, “to throw
together all which those Fathers have delivered concerning
the persons said to have been endued with the extraordinary
gifts of the Spirit.” (Ibid.)
“Now, whenever we think or speak with reverence,” say
you, “of those primitive times, it is always with regard to
these very Fathers whose testimonies I have been collecting. And they were indeed the chief persons and champions of the
Christian cause, the Pastors, Bishops, and Martyrs of the
primitive Church; namely, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Theo
philus, Tertullian, Minutius Felix, Origen, Cyprian, Arnobius,
Lactantius.” Sir, you stumble at the threshold. A common
dictionary may inform you that these were not all either
Pastors, Bishops, or Martyrs. 2. You go on as you set out: “Yet none of these have any
where affirmed, that they themselves were endued with any
power of working miracles.” (Page 22.) You should say,
With any of those extraordinary gifts promised by our Lord,
and conferred on his Apostles. No! Have “none of these anywhere affirmed, that they
themselves were endued” with any extraordinary.gifts? What think you of the very first of them, Justin Martyr
Either you are quite mistaken in the account you give of him
elsewhere, (pages 27, 30,) or he affirmed this of himself over
and over. And as to Cyprian, you will by and by spend
several pages together (page 101, &c.) on the extraordinary
gifts he affirmed himself to be endued with. But suppose they had not anywhere affirmed this of them
selves, what would you infer therefrom ? that they were not
endued with any extraordinary gifts? Then, by the very same
method of arguing, you might prove that neither St. Peter, nor
James, nor John, were endued with any such. For neither
do they anywhere affirm this of themselves in any of the
writings which they have left behind them. 3. Your argument concerning the apostolic Fathers is just
as conclusive as this. For if you say, “The writers following
the apostolic Fathers do not affirm them to have had any
miraculous gifts; therefore they had none;” by a parity of
reason you must say, “The writers following the Apostles do
not affirm them to have had any miraculous gifts; therefore
the Apostles had none.”
4.