Treatise Letter To Bishop Of Gloucester
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-bishop-of-gloucester-041 |
| Words | 400 |
xiii. 8, &c.)”
“The common opinion is, that this respects another life, as he
enforceshis argument by this observation: “Now we see through
a glass darkly; but then face to face: Now we know in part;
but then shall we know, even as also we are known.” (Page 99.)
“But the Apostle means, charity is to accompany the
Church in all its stages; whereas prophecy and all the rest
are only bestowed during its infant state, to support it against
the delusions and powers of darkness.” (Page 100.)
“The Corinthians abounded in these gifts, but were wanting
in charity. And this the Apostle here exposes, by proving
charity to be superior to them all, both in its qualities and dura
tion. The three first verses declare that the other gifts are use
less without charity. The next four specify the qualities of
charity; the remaining six declare its continuance: “Charity
never faileth: But whether there be prophecies, they shall fail;
whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be
knowledge, it shall vanish away. In the next verse he gives
the reason: ‘For we know in part, and we prophesy in part;
but when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in
part shall be done away: 'That is, when that Christian life, the
lines of which are marked out by the gospel, shall arrive to its
full vigour and maturity, then the temporary aids, given to sub
due prejudice, and to support the weak, shall, like scaffolding,
be removed. In other words, when that Christian life, wherein
the Apostles and first Christians were but infants, shall arrive
to its full vigour and maturity in their successors, then miracles
shall cease.” (Page 102.) But I fear that time is not yet come. I doubt, none that are now alive enjoy more of the vigour and
maturity of the Christian life than the very first Christians did. “To show that the loss of these will not be regretted when
the Church has advanced from a state of infancy to manhood,”
(alas the day ! Were the Apostles but infants to us?) “he
illustrates the case by an elegant similitude: ‘When I was a
child, I spake as a child;--but when I became a man, I put
away childish things.’ His next remark, concerning the defects
of human knowledge, is only an occasional answer to an objec
tion.