Treatise Letter To Bishop Of Gloucester
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-bishop-of-gloucester-022 |
| Words | 393 |
We wrestled with God in his behalf;
and our labour was not in vain. His soul was comforted; and
a few hours after he quietly fell asleep.” A strange proof this
likewise, either of inexorableness, or of “dooming men to per
dition 1’’ Therefore this charge too stands totally unsupported. Here is no proof of my unmercifulness yet. “Good fruits come next to be considered, which Mr. Wesley's idea of true religion does not promise. He saith,”
(I will repeat the words a little at large, that their true sense
may more clearly appear,) “‘In explaining those words, The
kingdom of God, or true religion, is not meats and drinks, I
was led to show, that religion does not properly consist in
harmlessness, using the means of grace, and doing good, that
is, helping our neighbours, chiefly by giving alms; but that a
man might both be harmless, use the means of grace, and do
muchgood, and yet have no truereligion at all.’” (Tract, p. 203.)
He may so. Yet whoever has true religion, must be “zealous
of good works.” And zeal for all good works is, according
to my idea, an essential ingredient of true religion. “Spiritual cures are all the good fruits he pretends to.”
(Pages 204, 205.) Not quite all, says William Kirkman, with
some others. “A few of his spiritual cures we will set in a fair
light: ‘The first time I preached at Swalwell,” (chiefly to col
liers, and workers in the iron work,) “‘none seemed to be con
vinced, only stunned.’” I mean amazed at what they heard,
though they were the first principles of religion. “But he
brings them to their senses with a vengeance.” No, not them. These were different persons. Are they lumped together, in
order to set things in a fair light? The whole paragraph runs
thus: “I carefully examined those who had lately cried out in
the congregation. Some of these, I found, could give no account
at all, how or wherefore they had done so; only that of a sud
den they dropped down, they knew not how; and what they
afterward said or did they knew not. Others could just remem
ber, they were in fear, but could not tell what they were in fear
of Several said they were afraid of the devil; and this was all
they knew.