Treatise Letter To Bishop Of Gloucester
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-bishop-of-gloucester-016 |
| Words | 400 |
James, who delivers the test for the trial of these
men's pretensions,” (the same mistake still,) “unquestionably
* On this account.--EIDT. thought a fanatic spirit did more mischief in the mode of
teaching, than in the matter taught; since of six marks, one
only concerns doctrine, all the rest the manner of the Teacher.”
(Page 170.) Nay, all six concern doctrine, as much as one. The truth is, they have nothing to do either with doctrine or
manner. “From St. Paul’s words, ‘Be instantin season, out of season,’
he infers more than they will bear; and misapplies them into
the bargain.” (Page 171.) When and where? I do not remem
ber applying them at all. “When seasonable times are appointed for holy offices, to
fly to unseasonable is factious.” (Page 172.) But it is not
clear, that five in the morning, and seven in the evening, (our
usual times,) are unseasonable. 2. We come now directly to the second article. “‘The wis
dom from above is peaceable. But the propagation of Method
ism has occasioned many and great violations of peace. In order
to know where the blame hereof lies, let us inquire the temper
which ‘makes for peace. For we may be assured the fault
lies not there, where such a temper is found.” (Page 173.) Thus
far we are quite agreed. “Now, the temper which makes for
peace is prudence.” This is one of the tempers which make
for peace; others are kindness, meekness, patience. “This
our Lord recommended by his own example.” (Pages 174
--177.) “But this Mr. W. calls, ‘the mystery of iniquity,
and the offspring of hell.’” (Page 178.) No, not this; not
the prudence which our Lord recommends. I call that so, and
that only, which the world, the men who know not God, style
Christian prudence. By this I mean subtlety, craft, dissimula
tion; study to please man rather than God; the art of trim
ming between God and the world, of serving God and mam
mon. Will any serious man defend this? And this only do I
condemn. But you “say, ‘Good sort of men, as they are called, are
‘the bane of all religion.” (Pages 179, 180.) And I think
so. By this “good sort of men,” I mean, persons who have a
iking to, but no sense of, religion; no real fear or love of God;
no truly Christian tempers.