Treatise Letter On Enthusiasm Of Methodists And Papists
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-on-enthusiasm-of-methodists-and-papists-010 |
| Words | 384 |
In that “seraphic rhapsody of divine love,” as you
term it, which you condemn in the lump, as rant and mad
Aness, there are several scriptural expressions, both from the
Old and New Testament. At first I imagined you did not
know them; those being books which you did not seem to be
much acquainted with. But upon laying circumstances
together, I rather suppose you was glad of so handsome an
opportunity to make as if you aimed at me, that you might
have a home stroke at some of those old enthusiasts. 25. The next words which you cite from me, as a proof of
my enthusiasm, are, “The power of God was in an unusual
manner present.” (Page 61.) I mean, many found an unusual
degree of that peace, joy, and love, which St. Paul terms,
“the fruit of the Spirit.” And all these, in conformity to his
doctrine, I ascribe to the power of God. I know you, in
conformity to your principles, ascribe them to the power of
nature. But I still believe, according to the old, scriptural
hypothesis, that whenever, in hearing the word of God, men
are filled with peace and love, God “confirms that word by
the Holy Ghost given unto those that hear it.”
26. As a further proof of my enthusiasm you mention
“special directions, mission, and calls by immediate revela
tion.” (Page 67.) For an instance of which, you cite those
words, “I know, and am assured, that God sent forth his
light and his truth.” I did know this. But do I say, “by
immediate revelation?” Not a tittle about it. This is your
own ingenious improvement upon my words. “However, it was by a special direction. For your own
words in the same paragraph are, “From the direction I
received from God this day, touching an affair of the greatest
importance.’” (Pages 68, 69.)
What, are these words in the same paragraph with those,
“I know and am assured, God sent forth his light and his
truth?” Why then do you tear the paragraph in two, and
put part in your sixty-seventh, part in your sixty-eighth and
sixty-ninth pages? O, for a plain reason,-to make it look
like two instances of enthusiasm, otherwise it could have
made but one at the most.