Treatise Farther Appeal Part 3
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-farther-appeal-part-3-039 |
| Words | 384 |
The Ethiopian hath not changed his skin. Were
they (in high life) delicate, tender, self-indulgent? Were they
nice in furniture or apparel? Were they fond of trifles, or of
their own dear persons? The leopard hath not changed her
spots. Yet their being with us for a time proves no more
than that we have not the miraculous discernment of spirits. Others you may find, in whom there was a real change. But
it was only for a season. They are now turned back, and are
two-fold more the children of hell than before. Yet neither is
this any manner of proof that the former work was not of God. No, not though these apostates should, with the utmost confi
dence, say all manner of evil against us. I expect they should. For every other injury hath been forgiven, and will be to the
end of the world. But hardly shall any one forgive the intoler
able injury of almost persuading him to be a Christian. When
these men, therefore, who were with us, but went out from
among us, assert things that may cause your ears to tingle, if
you consider either the Scripture or the nature of man it will
not stagger you at all : Much less will it excuse you for not
acknowledging the work in general to be of God. 28. But to all this it may possibly be replied, “When you
bring your credentials with you, when youprove by miracles what
you assert, then we will acknowledge that God hath sent you.”
What is it you would have us prove by miracles? that the
doctrines we preach are true? This is not the way to prove
that. (As our first Reformers replied to those of the Church of
Rome, who, you may probably remember, were continually
urging them with this very demand.) We prove the doctrineswe
preach by Scripture and reason, and, if need be, by antiquity. What else is it then we are to prove by miracles? Is it, (1.) That A. B. was for many years without God in
the world, a common swearer, a drunkard, a Sabbath-breaker? Or, (2.) That he is not so now? Or, (3.) That he continued so till he heard us preach, and
from that time was another man? Not so.