Treatise Farther Appeal Part 1
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-farther-appeal-part-1-086 |
| Words | 386 |
No more
than you believe he had eighty millions. Is not all this talk
of danger mere finesse, thrown in purely ad movendam invi
diam ** You know governments generally are suspicious;
*To excite ill-will.-EDIT. especially in the time of war; and therefore apply, as you sup
pose, to their weak side; in hopes, if possible, to deliver over
these heretics to the secular arm. However, I will answer as if
you spoke from your heart: For I am in earnest, if you are not. (1.) “The Preacher cannot know a tenth part of his congre
gation.” Let us come to the present state of things. The
largest congregations that now attend the preaching of any
Methodist, are those (God be merciful to me!) that attend
mine. And cannot I know a tenth part of one of these congre
gations, either at Bristol, Kingswood, Newcastle, or London? As strange as it may seem, I generally know two-thirds of the
congregation in every place, even on Sunday evening, and nine
in ten of those who attend at most other times. (2.) “All
people may come and carry on what designs they will.” Not so. All field-preaching is now in the open day. And were only ten
persons to come to such an assembly with arms, it would soon
be inquired, with what design they came. This is therefore,
(3.) No “great opportunity put into the hands of seditious
persons to raise disturbances.” And if ever any disturbance. has been raised, it was quite of another kind. :
The public, then, is entirely safe, if it be in no other danger
than arises from field-preaching. 7. There is one other sentence belonging to this head, in the
eighth section of the “Observations.” “Thereligious societies,”
you say, “in London and Westminster, for many years past,
have received no discouragements, but, on the contrary, have
been countenanced and encouraged both by the Bishops and
Clergy.” How is this? Have they then “qualified themselves
and places of their assembling, according to the Act of Tolera
tion?” Have they “embraced the protection which that Act
might give them, in case they complied with the conditions. of it?” If not, are they not all “liable to the penalties of
the several statutes made before that time against unlawful
assemblies?”
How can they escape?