Treatise Extract On Moravian Brethren
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-extract-on-moravian-brethren-000 |
| Words | 376 |
An Extract from A Short View of the Difference between the Moravian Brethren and the Wesleys
Source: The Works of John Wesley, Volume 10 (Zondervan)
Author: John Wesley
---
As those who are under the direction of Count Zinzendorf (vulgarly called Mora
vian Brethren) are the most plausible, and therefore far the most dangerous, of
all the Antinomians now in England, I first endeavour to guard such as are
simple of heart against being taken by those cunning hunters. THE difference between the Moravian doctrine and ours (in
this respect) lies here:
They believe and teach,--
“1. That Christ has done all which was necessary for the
salvation of all mankind. “2. That, consequently, we are to do nothing, as necessary
to salvation, but simply to believe in him. “3. That there is but one duty now, but one command,
viz., to believe in Christ. “4. That Christ has taken away all other commands and
duties, having wholly ‘abolished the law; that a believer is
therefore ‘free from the law, is not obliged thereby to do or
omit anything; it being inconsistent with his liberty to do
anything as commanded. “5. That we are sanctified wholly the moment we are justi
fied, and are neither more nor less holy to the day of our
death; entire sanctification, and entire justification, being in
one and the same instant. “6. That a believer is never sanctified or holy in himself,
but in Christ only; he has no holiness in himself at all, all
his holiness being imputed, not inherent. “7. That if a man regards prayer, or searching the Scrip
tures, or communicating, as matter of duty; if he judges
himself obliged to do these things, or is troubled when he
does them not; he is in bondage; he has no faith at all, but
is seeking salvation by the works of the law.”
We believe that the first of these propositions is ambiguous,
and all the rest utterly false. “1. Christ has done all that was necessary for the salvation
of all mankind.”
This is ambiguous. Christ has not done all which was neces
sary for the absolute salvation of all mankind. For notwith
standing all that Christ has done, he that believeth not shall
be damned.