Treatise Doctrine Of Original Sin
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-doctrine-of-original-sin-284 |
| Words | 394 |
“(2.) Since Adam’s posterity are born liable to death,
which is the due “wages of sin, it follows, that they are born
sinners. No art can set aside the consequence. “(3.) Either Christ is the Saviour of infants, or he is not;
if he is not, how is he ‘the Saviour of all men?” But, if he
is, then infants are sinners; for he suffered death for sinners
only. He ‘came to seek and save’ only ‘that which was
lost;’ to ‘save his people from their sins. It follows, that
infants are sinners; that they are lost, and, without Christ,
are undone for ever. “(4) The consequences of the contrary opinion are shock
ingly absurd:--
“(i.) If original sin is not, either death is not ‘the wages
of sin,” or there is punishment without guilt; God punishes
innocent, guiltless creatures. To suppose which is to impute
iniquity to the Most Holy.” (Page 84.)
“(ii.) If we are not sinners by nature, there are sinful
actions without a principle, fruit growing without a root. ‘No; men contract sinful habits by degrees, and then com
mence sinners.’ But whence is it that they contract those
habits so easily and speedily? Whence is it, that, as soon as
ever we discover reason, we discover sinful dispositions? The
early discoveries of reason prove a principle of reason planted
in our nature. In like manner, the early discoveries of sinful
dispositions prove those dispositions planted therein.” (Page 85.)
“(iii.) If we were not ruined by the first Adam, neither
are we recovered by the Second. If the sin of Adam was
not imputed to us, neither is the righteousness of Christ. “(iv.) If we do not derive a corrupt nature from Adam,
we do not derive a new nature from Christ. “(v.) A denial of original sin not only renders baptism
needless with regard to infants, but represents a great part
of mankind as having no need of Christ, or the grace of the
new covenant. I now speak of infants in particular, who, if
not “guilty before God,’ no more need the merits and grace
of the Second Adam than the brutes themselves. “Lastly. A denial of original sin contradicts the main
design of the gospel, which is to humble vain man, and to
ascribe to God’s free grace, not man’s free will, the whole of
his salvation.