Treatise Doctrine Of Original Sin
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-doctrine-of-original-sin-269 |
| Words | 386 |
For if man
was originally righteous or holy, we may argue thus: It was at
first natural to man to love and obey his Maker; yet it was
not necessary; neither as necessary is opposed to voluntary
or free; (for he both loved and obeyed freely and willingly;)
nor, as necessary means unavoidable; (this is manifest by the
event;) no, nor as necessary is opposed to rewardable; for
had he continued to love and obey, he would have been rewarded
with everlasting happiness. Therefore that assertion, ‘What
ever is natural is necessary, is palpably, glaringly false;
consequently, what is natural, as well as what is acquired,
may be good or evil, rewardable or punishable.” (Page 10.)
“II. Man’s original righteousness was lost by the first sin. Though he was made righteous, he was not made immutable. He was free to stand or fall. And he soon fell, and lost at
once both the favour and image of God. This fully appears,
1. From the account which Moses gives of our first parents,
where we read, (1.) ‘The eyes of them both were opened, and
they knew that they were naked;’ (Gen. iii.;) that is, they
were conscious of guilt, and touched with a pungent sense of
their folly and wickedness. They began to find their naked
ness irksome to them, and to reflect on it with sinful emotions
of soul. (2.) Immediately they were indisposed for com
munion with God, and struck with such a dread of him as
could not consist with true love. (Verse 8.) (3.) When
questioned by God, how do they prevaricate, instead of con
fessing their sin, and humbly imploring forgiveness! which
proves, not only their having "inned, but their being as yet
wholly impenitent. (4.) The judgment passed upon them
was a proof of their being guilty in the sight of God. Thus
was man’s original righteousness lost; thus did he fall both
from the favour and image of God.” (Pages 14, 15.)
“This appears, 2. From the guilt which inseparably attends
every trangression of the divine law. I say, every transgres
sion; because every sin virtually contains all sin; for ‘whoso
ever keepeth the whole law, and offendeth in one point, he is
guilty of all.” Every single offence is a virtual breach of all
the commands of God.