Treatise Doctrine Of Original Sin
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-doctrine-of-original-sin-246 |
| Words | 365 |
So St. Paul desires Philemon to impute any wrong he
had received from Onesimus to himself; that is, not the evil
action, but the damage he had sustained. “Indeed, when sin or righteousness are said to be imputed
to any man, on account of what himself hath done, the words
usually denote both the good or evil actions themselves, and
the legal result of them. But when the sin or righteousness
of one person is said to be imputed to another, then, generally,
those words mean only the result thereof; that is, a liableness
to punishment on the one hand, and to reward on the other. “But let us say what we will to confine the sense of the
imputation of sin and righteousness to the legal result, --the
reward or punishment of good or evil actions; let us ever so
explicitly deny the imputation of the actions themselves to
others; still Dr. Taylor will level almost all his arguments
against the imputation of the actions themselves, and then
triumph in having demolished what we never built, and
refuting what we never asserted.” (Page 444.)
“3. The Scripture does not, that I remember, anywhere
say, in express words, that the sin of Adam is imputed to his
children; or, that the sins of believers are imputed to Christ;
or, that the righteousness of Christ is imputed to believers:
But the true meaning of all these expressions is sufficiently
found in several places of Scripture.” (Page 446.)
“Yet since these express words and phrases, of the imputa
tion of Adam’s sin to us, of our sins to Christ, and of Christ's
righteousness to us, are not plainly written in Scripture, we
should not impose it on every Christian, to use these very
expressions. Let every one take his liberty, either of con
fining himself to strictly scriptural language, or of manifest
ing his sense of these plain scriptural doctrines, in words and
phrases of his own.” (Page 447.)
“But if the words were expressly written in the Bible, they
could not reasonably be interpreted in any other sense, than
this which I have explained by so many examples, both in
Scripture, history, and in common life.