Treatise Doctrine Of Original Sin
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-doctrine-of-original-sin-167 |
| Words | 381 |
“3. That our nature, as derived from Noah, has just the
same endowments, natural and moral, with which Adam was
created.” This does not follow from anything that has yet
been said. If it stands of itself, it may. “4. That whatever came upon us from ‘the judgment to
condemnation,’ came no farther than was consistent with that
blessing, pronounced upon Noah as well as Adam, “Be fruitful
and multiply.’” This is undoubtedly true; otherwise, the
human species could not have been continued. “So that
‘the condemnation which came upon all men, cannot infer
the ‘wrath’ of God upon mankind; ” (it may, notwithstand
ing that they “increase and multiply;” it must, if they are
“by nature children of wrath;”) “but only as subjecting
us to such evils as were perfectly consistent with his blessing,
declared to Adam as soon as he came out of his Maker’s
hands;” (page 89;) (namely, with the blessing, “Increase and
multiply;) “and, consequently, tosuch evils as God might justly
have subjected mankind to, before Adam sinned.” Whether
God could justly have done this, or not, what a consequence is
this!--“If God gave that blessing, “Increase and multiply,”
to men in general, as well as he did to Adam, then men in
general are not ‘children of wrath’ now, any more than Adam
was at his creation l’”
“5. It is no less evident, that when St. Paul says, “By
the disobedience of one many, or all, ‘were made sinners, he
cannot mean they “were made sinners’ in any sense incon
sistent with the blessing pronounced on man in innocence.”
True; not in any sense inconsistent with that blessing,
“Increase and multiply.” But this blessing is no way incon
sistent with their being “by nature children of wrath.”
* “From all which I conclude, that our state with regard
to the blessing of God, and the dignity and faculties of our
nature, unless debased by our own sins, is not inferior to
that in which Adam was created.” (Pages 90-93.) Be this
so or not, it cannot be concluded from anything that has
gone before. But we may still believe, that men in general
are “fallen short of the glory of God; ” are deprived of that
glorious image of God wherein man was originally created.