Treatise Doctrine Of Original Sin
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-doctrine-of-original-sin-129 |
| Words | 388 |
After repeating the intermediate verses, you yourself add,
“He subjoins a reason, which demonstrates the error of trust
ing in man: ‘The heart is deceitful above all things, and
desperately wicked; who can know it?’ (Verse 9.) This text,
therefore, does not mean, Who can know his own heart, but
another's?” Whether it means one or both, it positively
asserts, that “the heart” of man, of men in general, of
every man, is “desperately wicked.” Therefore, as to the
main point contained therein, “Christians do not understand
it wrong; ” (page 224;) neither misapply it at all. When I say, “I feel I have a ‘wicked heart,’” (another
thing which you do not understand,) “I mean this: I feel
much pride remaining in my heart, much self-will, much un
belief.” (Page 225.) Now, I really believe pride, and self
will, and unbelief to be essentially wicked tempers. There
fore, in whatever heart they remain, (and they remain in
yours as well as mine,) that is a “wicked heart.”
After a long. pause, you return to the seventh of the
Romans, and affirm: “We cannot, from anything in that
chapter, infer, that we came into the world with sinful dispo
sitions derived from Adam; for the Apostle says nothing
about Adam.” (Page 229.) He had said enough in the fifth
chapter of the cause: Here he only describes the effect; the
state of those who are now “brought to the birth; ” but
“there is not ” yet “strength to bring forth.”
“Nor can we infer from hence, that any man sins through
a principle which it was never in his power to command; for
then it would be no sin.” Upon this I would only ask, Are
you assured that no man transgresses God’s law (whether you
will call it sin or not) through a principle which it was never
in his power to command; at least, not for any time to
gether? Every passionate man can confute you in this. He
has sad experience of the contrary. To those objections which you have, in some sort, answered,
you subjoin the following questions:--
“1. Is not the doctrine of original sin necessary to account
for the being of so much wickedness in the world?”
You answer, “Adam’s nature, it is allowed, was not sinful;
and yet he sinned.