Treatise Doctrine Of Original Sin
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-doctrine-of-original-sin-121 |
| Words | 390 |
Take this with you, and you will
no more dream that “God could not create man in righteous
mess and true holiness;” or that “to talk of wanting that
righteousness in which Adam was created, is to talk of
nothing we want.” (Page 181.)
On Romans ii. 14, you observe: “This text clearly proves
that natural reason and understanding is a rule of action to all
mankind, and that all men ought to follow it. This, therefore,
overthrows the whole doctrine of original sin.” (Page 183.)
How do you prove the consequence? May not men have
some reason left, which in some measure discerns good from
evil, and yet be deeply fallen, even as to their understanding
as well as their will and affections? On Eccles. vii. 29, “God hath made man upright; but
they have found out many inventions,” you say, -
“‘Man” here means all mankind; “upright,’ endued with
powers to know and perform their duty.” (Pages 184, 185.)
You offer no proof for either of these assertions; and with
out it I cannot receive them. Again: “‘They,’” you say, “means mankind in general.”
I rather believe it means our first parents, who are by Moses
likewise comprehended under the common name of man, or
rather ETN “Adam.” So Gen. v. 2: “God called their
name Adam in the day when they were created.” And in
the day that they fell, whoever reads Genesis iii., will see,
“they found out,” not one, but “many inventions.” This
text, therefore, in its obvious meaning, teaches both the ori
ginal uprightness and subsequent fall of man. From all these texts it manifestly appears, (1.) That man
was created in the image of God. (2.) That this image con
sisted, not only in his rational and immortal nature, and his
dominion over the creatures, but also in knowledge, actual
knowledge, both of God and of his works; in the right state
of his intellectual powers, and in love, which is true holiness. “Objection 3. But do we not derive from Adam a moral
taint and infection, whereby we have a natural propensity to
sin? “I answer: We have many natural appetites and passions,
which, if they grow irregular, become sinful. But this does
not amount to a natural propensity to sin.” (Page 186.) But
is not pride sin Is not idolatry sin?