Treatise Doctrine Of Original Sin
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-doctrine-of-original-sin-081 |
| Words | 380 |
“My
glory,” saith the Lord, “I will not give to another.” How
comes it then to be given to the Lamb? (5.) You proceed: “The worthiness of Christ is his consum
mate virtue, obedience to God, and benevolence to his crea
tures.” Is this the only ground of his worthiness to be
“honoured even as the Father?” Is it on this ground alone,
that “all the angels of God” are to “worship him?” Or rather,
because “in the beginning,” from everlasting, he “was with
God, and was God?”
“Virtue is the only price which purchaseth everything with
God. True virtue, or the right exercise of reason, is true
worth, and the only valuable consideration which prevails
with God.” (Page 73.)
Do youthen conceive this to be the exact meaning of St. Paul,
when he says, “Ye are bought with a price?” and that where
he speaks of “the Church of God which he hath purchased with
his own blood,” he means with his own virtue? Agreeable to
which, “Thou hast redeemed us by thy blood,” must mean, by
the right exercise of thy reason * Well, then, might Father
Socinus say, Tota redemption is nostrae per Christum meta
phora: “The whole metaphor of our redemption by Christ.”
For on this scheme there is nothing real in it. “It was not the mere natural power or strength of the
Lamb, but his most excellent character.”--Sir, do “you
honour the Son, even as you honour the Father?” If you
did, could you possibly talk of him in this strain? However, all this does not affect the question; but it still
remains an unshaken truth, that all men's dying in Adam is
the grand cause why “the whole world lieth in wickedness.”
NEWINGTON, January 18, 1757. 1. In your Second Part you profess to “examine the princi
pal passages of Scripture, which Divines have applied in support
of the doctrine of original sin; particularly those cited by the
Assembly of Divines in their Larger Catechism.” (Pages 87,
88.) To this I never subscribed; but I think it is in the main a
very excellent composition, which I shall therefore cheerfully
endeavour to defend, so far as I conceive it is grounded on
clear Scripture. But I would first observe in general, with Dr.