Treatise Doctrine Of Original Sin
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-doctrine-of-original-sin-015 |
| Words | 390 |
It was imperii aemula ; “the
rival of the Roman glory.” These were open, undeniable
evidences of the public, national placability and mercy of the
Romans. Need instances of a more private nature be added? Behold, then, one for all, in that glory of Rome, that prodigy
of virtue, the great, the celebrated Cato. Cato the Elder, when
any of his domestics had worn themselves out in his service, and
grew decrepit with age, constantly turned them out to starve,
and was much applauded for his frugality in so doing. But
what mercy was this? Just such as that which dwelt in Cato
of Utica, who repaid the tenderness of his servant endeavour
ing to save his life, to prevent his tearing open his wound, by
striking him on the face with such violence as to fill his mouth
with blood. These are thy gods, O Deism . These the pat
terns so zealously recommended to our imitation |
17. And what was the real character of that hero, whom
Cato himself so admired? whose cause he espoused with such
eagerness, with such unwearied diligence? of Pompey the
Great? Surely never did any man purchase that title at so
cheap a rate | What made him great? The villany of Per
penna, and the treachery of Pharnaces. Had not the one
murdered his friend, the other rebelled against his father,
where had been Pompey’s greatness? So this stalking-horse
of a party procured his reputation in the commonwealth. And when it was procured, how did he use it? Let his own
poet Lucan speak:
Nec quenquam jam ferre potest Cesarve priorem,
Pompeiusve parem. “Nor Caesar could to a superior look;
Nor patriot Pompey could an equal brook.”
He would bear no equal ! And this a senator of Rome! Nay, the grand patron of the republic | But what a repub
lican himself, when this principle was the spring of all his
designs and actions ! Indeed, a less amiable character it is not
easy to find among all the great men of antiquity; ambitious,
vain, haughty, surly, and overbearing, beyond the common
rate of men. And what virtue had he to balance these faults? I can scarce find one, even in Lucan's account: It does not
appear that in the latter part of his life he had even military
virtues.