Wesley Corpus

Treatise Dialogue Antinomian And Friend

AuthorJohn Wesley
Typetreatise
YearNone
Passage IDjw-treatise-dialogue-antinomian-and-friend-008
Words373
Religious Experience Universal Redemption Christology
Go on. Friend.--You said next, “Was this our faith, it would be requisite to seek after this sort of sanctification.” From your own words it appears, that this is your faith, if you have any true faith at all. See then that you “seek after this sort of sanctification,” viz., the love of God and of your neighbour. For if you can be at rest, though you feel nothing of it, it is plain your heart is not clean, but hardened. Ant.--You may say what you please. You know no better. Friend.--You went on: “On the contrary, we believe that the blood shed upon the cross has put away and blotted out all our sins.” Why, who believes otherwise? If you mean only, that Christ then put away the punishment of all our sins, who believe in him; what a marvellous discovery is this ! I pray, whom doth this arguing reprove? Ant.--It reproves you, who deny that “an everlasting righteousness was then brought in.” Friend.--I do not deny it: No more than you understand it. But I ask, in what sense was it “brought in ?” What was it brought into? Was it then first brought into the world? You cannot say this, without saying that all who went out of the world before that hour were lost. Or was it brought into the souls of believers? Then believers have an inward or inherent righteousness. You had better, therefore, let this text alone. It will do no service at all to your cause. Ant.--I see plain you are as blind as a beetle still. I am afraid your head-knowledge will destroy you. Did not I tell you, “Our hearts and consciences are made perfectly clean by our believing; and that in this consists true purity of soul, and not in habitual qualities? Thus we are made per fectly holy.” And though “the vile, sinful body continually disposes the mind to evil,” yet “the blood of Christ makes us free from sin, and, as it were, destroys the connexion.” Friend.--Destroys the connexion of what? I doubt you have stumbled upon another word which you do not under stand. But whether you understand yourself or no, it is sure I do not understand you.